Retrospective cross-sectional study finds temporary venous access predominates in hemodialysis patients, highlighting substantial barriers to achieving preferred permanent arteriovenous fistulas.
INTRODUCTION: Vascular access (VA) and its maintenance is of optimum priority in haemodialysis patients. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed to evaluate the types of vascular access used by patients on haemodialysis at the dialysis unit of a teaching hospital in Ghana. METHODS: a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of 80 patients’ data on haemodialysis at the renal clinic of a Teaching hospital was performed. The sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained, organized and analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: a total of 80 participants were studied, 65% being males and over 50% of them being ≥ 45 years with (87.8%) being married. Among the 35.5% who had been on dialysis for less than 3 months, 85.2% were using temporary venous access (TVA), with 14.8% using tunneled venous access (TUV). However, for those on dialysis for more than a year (32.9%), 12% were using TVA, 52% having arteriovenous fistula (AVF) with 36% using TUV. The commonest venous access used for rural dwellers was temporary venous access constituting 76.9% with majority of urban dwellers using the arteriovenous fistula (80.0%). The dominant access vein was the internal jugular vein forming 80.5%. All the AKI and majority of the AKI/CKD patients (73.9%) had TVA. Majority (40.3%) of the ESRD patients also had TVA. Although there was no significant association between sociodemographic data and type of vascular access, we found a significant association between diagnosis, duration of dialysis and type of vascular access. CONCLUSION: temporary vascular access is the commonest vascular access for most patients on chronic haemodialysis in our centre. This is followed by arteriovenous fistula and tunneled vascular access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okyere et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: