Key result
Carvedilol resulted in lower cardiac sympathetic activity compared to metoprolol (12.9% vs. 22.1%, P=0.003) and lower von Willebrand factor levels in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Does carvedilol reduce cardiac sympathetic activity and hemostasis markers compared to metoprolol in stable heart failure patients with LVEF < 40%?
RCT (n=21)
Open-label
Randomized crossover
Does carvedilol reduce cardiac sympathetic activity and hemostasis markers compared to metoprolol in stable heart failure patients with LVEF < 40%?
Absolute Event Rate: 12.9% vs 22.1%
p-value: p=0.003
Carvedilol reduces cardiac sympathetic activity and von Willebrand factor concentrations more than metoprolol in patients with heart failure, suggesting a potential mechanism for reduced thromboembolic risk.
Carvedilol may be preferred over metoprolol in HFrEF for greater sympathetic and hemostatic effects; extends RCT evidence on differential beta-blocker actions.
UNLABELLED: Carvedilol, a nonselective β-blocker, may be more effective than the selective β-blocker metoprolol in reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in heart failure. The aim of this study was, first, to assess whether there is a differential response in cardiac sympathetic activity by (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) imaging when either β-blocker is used. Second, we assessed whether that response correlates with levels of various serum factors that serve as markers for coagulability. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, open-label crossover study with masked outcome assessments, stable heart failure patients (left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%) homozygous for the Arg16/Gln27 (n = 13) or Gly16/Glu27 haplotype (n = 8) of the β2-receptor were randomized to equipotent dosages of carvedilol or metoprolol for two 6-wk periods. Primary outcome was sympathetic activity as measured by (123)I-MIBG myocardial washout. Secondary outcomes included markers of hemostasis. RESULTS: (123)I-MIBG cardiac washout was lower during carvedilol than metoprolol treatment (12.9% ± 3.9% vs. 22.1% ± 2.8%, respectively, P = 0.003), irrespective of β2-adrenergic receptor haplotype. In addition, treatment with carvedilol resulted in a lower von Willebrand factor than did metoprolol (149% ± 13% vs. 157% ± 13%, respectively, P = 0.01), irrespective of β2-adrenergic receptor haplotype. CONCLUSION: Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol resulted in greater reduction of sympathetic activity after 6 wk of treatment and lower von Willebrand factor concentrations in both Arg16/Gln27 and Gly16/Glu27 individuals. Therefore, carvedilol may reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure, irrespective of β2-receptor haplotype status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peuter et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=21). Carvedilol vs. Metoprolol was evaluated on Sympathetic activity as measured by (123)I-MIBG myocardial washout (p=0.003). Carvedilol resulted in lower cardiac sympathetic activity compared to metoprolol (12.9% vs. 22.1%, P=0.003) and lower von Willebrand factor levels in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: