Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated beneficial effects in heart failure patients with a preponderance of cardiac over noncardiac comorbid burden (cardiac-comorbid index >5 points; interaction P<0.05).
Why the study?
The net clinical benefit of cardiac disease-modifying drugs may be influenced by interacting domains of disease burden, requiring assessment of how cardiac, comorbid, and demographic factors affect HF prognosis and sacubitril/valsartan efficacy across LVEF.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical outcomes compared to a renin-angiotensin antagonist in symptomatic heart failure patients depending on their balance of cardiac versus noncardiac comorbid burden?
Meta-Analysis (n=13,195)
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical outcomes compared to a renin-angiotensin antagonist in symptomatic heart failure patients depending on their balance of cardiac versus noncardiac comorbid burden?
The therapeutic benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure is most pronounced in patients whose disease burden is predominantly cardiac rather than driven by noncardiac comorbidities or demographic factors.
May support sacubitril/valsartan preference in cardiac-predominant HF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background: The net clinical benefit of cardiac disease-modifying drugs might be influenced by the interaction of different domains of disease burden. We assessed the relative contribution of cardiac, comorbid, and demographic factors in heart failure (HF) and how their interplay might influence HF prognosis and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods: We combined data from 2 global trials that evaluated the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan compared with a renin-angiotensin antagonist in symptomatic HF patients (PARADIGM-HF [Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure; n=8399] and PARAGON-HF [Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptors Blockers Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction; n=4796]). We decomposed the previously validated Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score into cardiac (left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, blood pressure, time since HF diagnosis, HF medications), noncardiac comorbid (body mass index, creatinine, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking), and demographic (age, gender) categories. Based on these domains, an index representing the balance of cardiac to noncardiac comorbid burden was created (cardiac-comorbid index). Clinical outcomes were time to first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality. Results: Higher scores of the cardiac domain were observed in PARADIGM-HF (10 [7–13] versus 5 [3–6], P <0.001) and higher scores of the demographic domain in PARAGON-HF (10 [8–13] versus 5 [2–9], P <0.001). In PARADIGM-HF, the contribution of the cardiac domain to clinical outcomes was greater than the noncardiac domain ( P <0.001), while in PARAGON-HF the attributable risk of the comorbid and demographic categories predominated. Individual scores from each sub-domain were linearly associated with the risk of clinical outcomes ( P <0.001). Beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan were observed in patients with preponderance of cardiac over noncardiac comorbid burden (cardiac-comorbid index >5 points), suggesting a significant treatment effect modification (interaction P <0.05 for both outcomes). Conclusions: Domains of disease burden are clinically relevant features that influence the prognosis and treatment of patients with HF. The therapeutic benefits of sacubitril/valsartan vary according to the balance of components of disease burden, across different ranges of left ventricular ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohde et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Symptomatic heart failure (n=13,195). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Renin-angiotensin antagonist was evaluated on Time to first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality (p=<0.05). Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated beneficial effects in heart failure patients with a preponderance of cardiac over noncardiac comorbid burden (cardiac-comorbid index >5 points; interaction P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: