Key result
This editorial highlights the most read articles published in Circulation Research between January 2010 and December 2011 based on full text and PDF downloads.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Highlights the most read articles in Circulation Research from 2010-2011 to showcase scientific excellence and burgeoning research areas.
The following represent a selection of the most read Circulation Research articles published between January 2010 and December 2011, presented in reverse order of publication. Articles were selected based on the number of Full Text/PDF downloads, adjusted to compensate for differences in the length of time articles have been available online. As stated in the past, our motivation in compiling such lists of most read articles is multifarious. By highlighting these articles, we wish to direct the attention of our readers to new information that may be of particular interest to a large fraction of the community of cardiovascular scholars. In addition, a synopsis of the most popular articles can be a useful indicator of burgeoning areas of research that are likely to dominate the landscape for years to come. This “honor roll” is also meant to acknowledge the outstanding work of the authors and their efforts in advancing the frontiers of cardiovascular science. Furthermore, we believe that the articles highlighted below represent paradigms of scientific excellence, particularly with respect to the three criteria that we value most at Circulation Research : conceptual and/or mechanistic novelty, scientific impact, and methodological rigor. Finally, we hope that this list will provide tangible evidence of the high (and rising) level of scientific excellence of the work published in Circulation Research .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2012 study reported an editorial. This editorial highlights the most read articles published in Circulation Research between January 2010 and December 2011 based on full text and PDF downloads.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: