Key result
Left cardiac sympathetic denervation improved the electromechanical window by a mean of 35 ms (P=0.04) in patients with Long QT Syndrome, with a more favorable change seen in LQT1 patients.
Why the study?
Does left cardiac sympathetic denervation improve the electromechanical window in patients with Type 1 or Type 2 Long QT Syndrome?
Cohort (n=13)
Does left cardiac sympathetic denervation improve the electromechanical window in patients with Type 1 or Type 2 Long QT Syndrome?
Mean Difference: 35
p-value: p=0.04
Left cardiac sympathetic denervation may exert its antitorsadogenic effect in LQT1 patients partly by restoring electromechanical order, as evidenced by normalization of the electromechanical window.
May partly explain LCSD antitorsadogenic effects in LQT1; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) exerts significant antifibrillatory effects in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS). Recently, electromechanical window (EMW) has emerged as a novel torsadogenic marker in LQTS, superior to QT interval (QTc) in distinguishing symptomatic from asymptomatic patients. OBJECTIVE: To explore the hypothesis that LCSD improves EMW most favorably in patients with LQT1. DESIGN: From September 2006 to July 2015, 44 LQT1 and 25 LQT2 patients underwent LCSD. Subset analysis was performed on the six LQT1 and seven LQT2 patients who had echocardiograms both pre-LCSD and ≥3 months post-LCSD. EMW is defined as the time difference (ms) between aortic valve closure and the end of the QT interval, measured from an ECG on the concurrent echocardiogram. RESULTS: Compared to published normal EMW values of 22 ± 19 ms, pre-LCSD EMW mean values were -78 ± 36 ms in LQT1 and -71 ± 35 ms in LQT2 (P < .001). Following LCSD, there was a 57 ± 35 ms decrease in QTc in LQT1 (P = .16) and 23 ± 21 ms decrease in QTc in LQT2 (P = .3). Overall, there was a 35 ± 57 ms mean improvement in EMW post-LCSD (P = .04). Five of the 6 (83%) LQT1 subjects had a favorable EMW change post-LCSD (mean improvement 56 ± 25 ms, P = .04). Five of the 7 (71%) LQT2 subjects had a favorable EMW change post-LCSD (mean improvement 18 ± 19 ms, P = .2). CONCLUSIONS: The precise mechanism of the LCSD therapeutic effect in LQTS patients is not fully understood. This pilot study raises the possibility that LCSD's antitorsadogenic effect in patients with LQT1 could be conferred in part by restoration of electromechanical order, evidenced by normalization of the EMW.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Type 1 or Type 2 Long QT Syndrome (n=13). Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) vs. Pre-LCSD baseline was evaluated on Mean improvement in electromechanical window (EMW) post-LCSD (MD 35 ms, p=0.04). Left cardiac sympathetic denervation improved the electromechanical window by a mean of 35 ms (P=0.04) in patients with Long QT Syndrome, with a more favorable change seen in LQT1 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: