Why the study?
Does the novel Slope Index (SI) improve discrimination of physiologic vs synthetic RR series and arrhythmia vs healthy subjects compared to conventional indices?
Does the novel Slope Index (SI) improve discrimination of physiologic vs synthetic RR series and arrhythmia vs healthy subjects compared to conventional indices?
Effect estimate: ROC area 0.84 and 0.82
The novel Slope Index (SI) provides superior quantification of heart rate variability phase asymmetry compared to conventional indices, potentially aiding in the discrimination of pathological HRV.
May aid arrhythmia discrimination via HRV asymmetry; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Heart rate asymmetry (HRA) is considered as a physiological phenomenon in healthy subjects. In this article, we propose a novel HRA index, Slope Index (SI), to quantify phase asymmetry of heart rate variability (HRV) system. We assessed the performance of proposed index in comparison with conventional (Guzik's Index (GI) and Porta's Index (PI)) HRA indices. As illustrative examples, we used two case studies: (i) differentiate physiologic RR series from synthetic RR series; and (ii) discriminate arrhythmia subjects from Healthy using beat-to-beat heart rate time series. The results showed that SI is a superior parameter than GI and PI for both case studies with maximum ROC area of 0.84 and 0.82 respectively. In contrast, GI and PI had ROC areas {0.78, 0.61} and {0.50, 0.56} in two case studies respectively. We also performed surrogate analysis to show that phase asymmetry is caused by a physiologic phenomena rather than a random nature of the signal. In conclusion, quantification of phase asymmetry of HRV provides additional information on HRA, which might have a potential clinical use to discriminate pathological HRV in future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karmakar et al. (2015) studied Arrhythmia. Slope Index (SI) vs. Guzik's Index (GI) and Porta's Index (PI) was evaluated on Discrimination of physiologic from synthetic RR series and arrhythmia from healthy subjects (ROC area 0.84 and 0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: