In vitro study demonstrates that cell-surface proteoglycans shield Chinese hamster ovary cells from cationic lipid toxicity, suggesting glycosaminoglycans are essential for efficient transfection.
A dependence on proteoglycans for cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer has been suggested in previous studies [Mislick and Baldeschwieler (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 12349-12354; Mounkes, Zhong, Cipres-Palacin, Heath and Debs (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26164-26170]. We have evaluated the mechanism of proteoglycan involvement in cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer. DNA plasmid uptake and gene expression were studied in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (CHO-K1), heparan sulphate-deficient CHO cells (pgsD-677) and proteoglycan-deficient CHO cells (pgsB-618). At an optimal ratio of cationic lipid to DNA, a substantial decrease in reporter gene expression was observed in proteoglycan-deficient cells compared with that in heparan sulphate-deficient and wild-type cells. However, there were no differences in reporter gene expression between the cell lines when transfected by electroporation. Moreover, all cell lines exhibited equal cationic-lipid-DNA complex uptake activities, as assessed by the measurement of intracellular (32)P-labelled and rhodamine-labelled DNA plasmid. An analysis of reflected-light images of wild-type and proteoglycan-deficient cells suggested that cationic lipids were preferentially toxic to proteoglycan-deficient cells. Cell-growth assays confirmed this, showing that cationic lipids exhibited a greater anti-proliferative activity in proteoglycan-deficient cells and in chlorate-treated wild-type cells than in the other cell lines. The growth-inhibitory effect of cationic lipids was abrogated by the addition of exogenous sulphated glycosaminoglycans. We conclude that the glycosaminoglycan part of proteoglycans serves a protective role against cationic lipid cytotoxicity, allowing optimal transfection efficiency in vitro.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belting et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: