Key result
Post-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy exhibited significantly different longitudinal and circumferential strains (p<0.05) and higher pro-inflammatory cytokines compared to non-ischemic forms.
Why the study?
Do cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and biochemical parameters differentiate between post-ischemic and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=134)
Do cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and biochemical parameters differentiate between post-ischemic and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
p-value: p=<0.05
Advanced imaging techniques like CMR and strain echocardiography, along with inflammatory biomarkers, can help differentiate between ischemic and non-ischemic etiologies of dilated cardiomyopathy.
Etiology-specific strain and cytokine differences in dilated cardiomyopathy are hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed before diagnostic use.
Dilated Cardiomyopathy is a high-incident disease, which diagnosis of and treatments are clinical priority. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging; echocardiography and the biochemical parameters that can help us differentiate between the post-ischemic and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Materials and methods. The study enrolled 134 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: 74 with the post-ischemic form and 60 with the non-ischemic one. All patients underwent a coronary imaging test, with echocardiogram, cardiac magnetic resonance and a blood test. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were evaluated using Luminex kit. Data was compared between the two groups. Results. Echocardiography allowed recognition of Left Ventricular Non Compaction in 2 patients. Longitudinal and circumferential strains were significantly different in the two groups (p<0.05). Using CMR imaging a post-myocarditis scar was diagnosed in 2 patients and a post-ischemic scar in 95% of patients with the chronic ischemic disease. The interleukin IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α levels were higher in the post-ischemic group compared with the non-ischemic one. Conclusions. The use of second level techniques with a high sensitivity and specificity would help distinguish among different sub-forms of dilated cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazio et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=134). Post-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy vs. Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Longitudinal and circumferential strains (p=<0.05). Post-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy exhibited significantly different longitudinal and circumferential strains (p<0.05) and higher pro-inflammatory cytokines compared to non-ischemic forms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: