Comparative analysis reveals high agreement among boundary layer height sensors under sharp capping inversions, indicating measurement consistency depends on atmospheric stratification.
Three in-situ and five remote sensing techniques for measuring the height of the daytime convective boundary layer were compared. There was, as a rule, good agreement between the different systems when the capping inversion was steep and well defined, and some variability when the stratification was not so sharply defined. Two indirect methods for estimating boundary-layer heights from the length scales of convective motions in the layer are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaimal et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: