Key result
The Cook Celect IVC filter demonstrated a 93.4% successful retrieval rate from attempted retrievals, though failed retrieval secondary to hook endothelialisation remains an issue.
Why the study?
Is the retrievable Cook Celect inferior vena cava filter safe and effective for insertion and retrieval in patients requiring IVC filtration?
Observational (n=115)
Is the retrievable Cook Celect inferior vena cava filter safe and effective for insertion and retrieval in patients requiring IVC filtration?
The Cook Celect IVC filter demonstrates high rates of successful insertion and retrieval, though hook endothelialisation remains a cause of failed retrieval with extended dwell times.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High retrieval success may support selective Cook Celect use; leaves open strategies to mitigate endothelialisation failures in extended-dwell cases.
The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with the retrievable Cook Celect inferior vena cava (IVC) filter (William Cook, Europe) with regard to insertion, efficiency, ease of retrieval, and any associated complications. A retrospective review was performed of 115 patients (41 female, 74 male, mean age 47.97 years) who underwent Cook Celect IVC filter insertion between December 2005 and October 2007. Filter insertion was successful in all patients. Of the 115 filters inserted, 57 have been successfully retrieved (49.6%) to date. The successful retrieval rate from attempted retrieval was 93.4%. The mean dwell time of successfully retrieved filters was 114.9 days (range 14-267 days). Failed retrievals were due to a thrombosed vena cava (n = 1) and endothelialisation of the filter (n = 3). In the failed retrieval group the mean implantation time was 142 days (range 78-211 days). While this is the first retrospective clinical study on the Cook Celect filter, results to date are promising. We demonstrated an efficacious filter with a high successful retrieval rate of 93.4% and a low complication rate. The filter was assessed with extended dwell times (range 14-267 days). Failed retrieval secondary to hook endothelialisation continues to be an issue with this filter. We recognize that a limitation of our study was the lack of systematic follow-up for clinically silent complications. Further studies to evaluate longer term outcomes and effectiveness of this filter are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doody et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Patients requiring inferior vena cava filter (n=115). Cook Celect inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was evaluated on Successful retrieval rate from attempted retrieval. The Cook Celect IVC filter demonstrated a 93.4% successful retrieval rate from attempted retrievals, though failed retrieval secondary to hook endothelialisation remains an issue.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: