Key result
Enalapril therapy for 3 weeks decreased GFR(INULIN) in type 1 diabetes adolescents with hyperfiltration (174 to 140 mL/min/1.73 m2; P=0.01), while normofilterers showed a rising trend (P=0.35).
Why the study?
Does cystatin C accurately detect changes in GFR after enalapril therapy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes?
Observational (n=20)
Does cystatin C accurately detect changes in GFR after enalapril therapy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 140% vs 174%
p-value: p=0.01
Cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimates accurately reflect the differing GFR responses to enalapril in hyperfiltering versus normofiltering adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Cystatin C estimates may track enalapril GFR responses in type 1 diabetes adolescents; hypothesis-generating for noninvasive monitoring pending prospective trials.
Although it is known that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines in response to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, recent observations using GFR(CYSTATIN C) have shown a paradoxical increase calling into question its validity. In this descriptive study, we aimed to reconcile this observation by simultaneously measuring GFR(CYSTATIN C), GFR(CREATININE), and gold standard GFR(INULIN) responses to ACE inhibition. Adolescents with type 1 diabetes and hyperfiltration (n = 9, GFR(INULIN) ≥ 135 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) or normofiltration (n = 11) were studied during clamped euglycemia at baseline and after 3-week enalapril therapy. In hyperfilterers, the anticipated GFR(INULIN) decline before and after enalapril was observed (174 ± 29 mL/min/1.73 m(2) to 140 ± 26 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = .01). Although GFR(CYSTATIN C) equations tended to underestimate while GFR(CREATININE) equations tended to overestimate baseline GFR(INULIN) in hyperfilterers, both approaches generally reflected declining GFR(INULIN) responses to enalapril. Normofilterers demonstrated a trend toward rising GFR(INULIN) in response to enalapril (112 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m(2) to 119 ± 27 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = .35). Although all estimating equations tended to overestimate baseline GFR(INULIN), they generally reflected the rising trend in GFR(INULIN) in response to enalapril in normofilterers. Although GFR(INULIN) declines in response to enalapril among hyperfilterers, we confirm the previous observation that it demonstrates a trend to rising among normofilterers. These group trends are both reflected by cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perkins et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Type 1 diabetes (n=20). Enalapril vs. Baseline was evaluated on GFR(INULIN) in hyperfilterers (p=0.01). Enalapril therapy for 3 weeks decreased GFR(INULIN) in type 1 diabetes adolescents with hyperfiltration (174 to 140 mL/min/1.73 m2; P=0.01), while normofilterers showed a rising trend (P=0.35).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: