Key result
Mean femoral version was 22° on CT and 24° on MRI with no significant differences, though reported normal ranges varied widely depending on the measurement method used.
Why the study?
Correct quantification of femoral version is crucial for femoroacetabular impingement, but different measurement methods and varying normal values cause confusion.
Observational (n=84)
The normal range of femoral version varies significantly depending on the measurement method used, which is critical for accurate diagnosis and surgical planning in hip preservation surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FV norms vary by femoral neck axis method; leaves open standardized protocols for hip preservation diagnostics.
Correct quantification of femoral version (FV) is crucial for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients for diagnosis and for surgical planning. However, different measurement methods for FV and different normal values are confusing. The study aimed to investigate differences in FV measurement methods and to review normal FV. This retrospective comparative study investigated a total of 84 hips for FV measurement: 48 hips (asymptomatic patients) and 36 hips (asymptomatic volunteers) without hip pain. The 48 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) for another reason (mean age 63 ± 11 years) and most (39 hips, 81%) were male patients. The 36 hips reported no hip pain at the time of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (mean age 27 ± 7 years, 20 female patients, 56%). FV was measured on CT or MRI included pelvis and knee) and with the Murphy method. Mean FV for 48 hips was 22° (range 5–34°), and for 36 hips, it was 24° (7–44°). No significant differences were found between the two groups. For 39 male patients with CT scans, the mean FV was 21° (6–34°) and was significantly (P = 0.041) decreased compared to female patients (FV of 26°). For the review, 18 studies were compared that evaluated normal FV (total of 2275 hips) in the literature. Increasing values for normal FV were found for measurement methods with a more distal definition of the femoral neck axis: Normal values were reported for the Lee method (most proximal definition; 8–11°), Reikeras method (9–20°), Oblique/Jarrett method (9–15°), Tomczak method (22–24°), and Murphy method (most distal: 18–23°). Reported normal range of FV differs between measurement methods. This is important for patients with FAI/hip dysplasia undergoing hip preservation surgery (hip arthroscopy/femoral derotation osteotomy).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lerch et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Asymptomatic without hip pain (n=84). Femoral version measurement on CT vs. Femoral version measurement on MRI was evaluated on Mean femoral version. Mean femoral version was 22° on CT and 24° on MRI with no significant differences, though reported normal ranges varied widely depending on the measurement method used.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: