Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, we sought to identify factors responsible for the positive modulation of lactoferrin (LF), a neutrophil-specific, secondary-granule protein gene. Initial reporter gene transfection assays indicated that the first 89 base pairs of the LF promoter are capable of directing myeloid-specific LF gene expression. The presence of a C/EBP site flanked by 2 Sp1 sites within this segment of the LF promoter prompted us to investigate the possible role of these sites in LF expression. Cotransfection studies of LF-89luc plasmid with increasing concentrations of a C/EBP expression vector in myeloid cells resulted in a linear transactivation of luciferase reporter activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays found that the C/EBP site is recognized by C/EBP and that both LF Sp1 binding sites bind the Sp1 transcription factor specifically in myeloid cells. Mutation of either Sp1 site markedly reduced activity of the LF-89luc plasmid in myeloid cells, and neither Sp1 mutant plasmid was transactivated by a C/EBP expression plasmid to the same extent as wild-type LF-89luc. We also transfected LF-89luc into Drosophila Schneider cells, which do not express endogenous Sp1, and demonstrated up-regulation of luciferase activity in response to a cotransfected Sp1 expression plasmid, as well as to a C/EBP expression plasmid. Furthermore, cotransfection of LF-89luc plasmid simultaneously with C/EBP and Sp1 expression plasmids resulted in an increase in luciferase activity greater than that induced by either factor alone. Taken together, these observations indicate a functional interaction between C/EBP and Sp1 in mediating LF expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanna‐Gupta et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: