Why the study?
Does a newly developed equation improve the prediction of peak VO2 in obese subjects undergoing CPET compared to published equations?
Does a newly developed equation improve the prediction of peak VO2 in obese subjects undergoing CPET compared to published equations?
A newly developed equation improves the prediction of peak VO2 in obese adults undergoing CPET, which may help optimize ramp protocol design and cardiorespiratory fitness evaluations.
Must use "LEAVES OPEN" framing with cautious language.
Summary We aimed to develop an equation to predict peak VO 2 in obese subjects undergoing CPET . In addition, we evaluated and compared three published equations. We randomized 346 obese subjects undergoing CPET into a group for developing the equation ( n = 272) and a group for cross‐validation ( n = 74), compared through the Bland and Altman method. Height, sex and age were responsible for 85·5% of total variability of the peak VO 2. Additional 1% and 0·7% of the variability were, respectively, explained by physical inactivity and diabetes. The equation devised was as follows: The mean difference between the estimated and measured peak VO 2 was 7 ml min −1 , with a 23·9% bias. Published equations overestimated the peak VO 2 by 35·3%, 49·1% and 46·2% bias. The equation developed in this study performed better in predicting peak VO 2 in obese adults improving ramp protocol design and CRF evaluations in obese subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbosa et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: