Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The primary objective was to develop equipment and evaluate protocols for non-invasive assessment of contractile properties of human arm flexors. The research design consisted of a non-randomized control trial, with repeated measures. Data from six males and two females were gathered in a clinical research laboratory. The elbow flexor torque following motor point or direct nerve stimulation was measured in response to single pulses or short trains of electrical pulses. Length--tension relationships were determined; comparative data were obtained at the identified optimal muscle lengths. Twitch waveforms and peak torques following either type of stimulation were reproducible (within 10%). Peak torques following a 4-pulse small interpulse interval stimulation were nearly identical for motor-point activation and direct nerve stimulation (15.2+/- 6.6Nm for motor point stimulation; 14.5 +/- 6.6Nm for nerve stimulation). Average perceived pain indexes associated with 4-pulse stimuli were slightly higher following nerve stimulation (782 for nerve versus 6.23 for motor-point, n=8). A reliable methodology (motor-point stimulation) has been identified to perform stimulated force assessment of human arm flexors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: