Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Penile carcinoma has a high incidence in India, with 27% of the patients being under 50 years old and sexually active. There is growing interest in penile-preserving strategies owing to disadvantages of penile amputation. Penile amputation leads to both poor sexual performance and deteriorated quality of life. Again, the traditional 2 cm margin criteria are no longer considered important for better oncological outcomes. The main advantages of all penile-preserving surgeries are maintained sexual function and ability of voiding in standing position. The indications for performing penile-preserving surgeries are small tumors, located at the glans and distal shaft and carcinoma in situ or ≤T1 stage with no lymph node metastasis. The main disadvantage of penile-preserving surgeries is increased local recurrence; however, it does not lead to decrease survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keval Patel (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: