Why the study?
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing using a dynamic leg press yield comparable peak oxygen uptake and heart rate to a cycle ergometer in healthy young males?
Does cardiopulmonary exercise testing using a dynamic leg press yield comparable peak oxygen uptake and heart rate to a cycle ergometer in healthy young males?
While a dynamic leg press is technically feasible for cardiopulmonary exercise testing, it yields significantly lower peak oxygen uptake and heart rate compared to a cycle ergometer, likely due to earlier onset of muscular fatigue.
Dynamic leg press yields lower peak VO2 than cycle ergometry; leaves open its validity as an alternative CPET modality.
BACKGROUND: Leg-press machines are widely employed for musculoskeletal conditioning of the lower-limbs and they provide cardiovascular benefits for resistance training in cardiac patients. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a dynamic leg press (DLP) for incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and to compare the results with those obtained using a cycle ergometer (CE). METHODS: Twelve healthy participants aged 27±4 years (mean ± standard deviation) performed incremental cardiopulmonary exercise tests on a DLP and on a CE. To facilitate CPET, the DLP was augmented with force and angle sensors, a work rate estimation algorithm, and a visual feedback system. Gas exchange variables and heart rate were recorded breath-by-breath using a cardiopulmonary monitoring system. Likewise, the sub-maximal cardiopulmonary parameters, viz. the first and second ventilatory thresholds, and ramp duration were significantly lower for the DLP. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic leg press was found to be feasible for CPET: the approach was technically implementable and all peak and sub-maximal cardiopulmonary parameters were able to be identified. The lower outcome values observed with the DLP can be attributed to a peripheral factor, namely the earlier onset of muscular fatigue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chrif et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: