Key result
The enhanced dynamic leg press was feasible for cardiopulmonary exercise training, with participants achieving a mean oxygen uptake within 0.07 L/min of the target during constant-load training.
Why the study?
Following engineering development on a dynamic leg-press to enable work-rate estimation and feedback, this study aimed to assess the device's feasibility for constant-load and high-intensity interval cardiopulmonary exercise training.
Is an enhanced dynamic leg press feasible for accurate cardiopulmonary exercise training using constant-load and high-intensity interval training in healthy males?
Is an enhanced dynamic leg press feasible for accurate cardiopulmonary exercise training using constant-load and high-intensity interval training in healthy males?
An enhanced dynamic leg press with visual feedback is technically feasible and acceptable for prescribing and performing constant-load and high-intensity interval cardiopulmonary training.
Supports sensor-integrated leg-press feasibility in humans; leaves open clinical efficacy for cardiopulmonary outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Leg-press devices are one of the most widely used training tools for musculoskeletal strengthening of the lower-limbs, and have demonstrated important cardiopulmonary benefits for healthy and patient populations. Further engineering development was done on a dynamic leg-press for work-rate estimation by integrating force and motion sensors, power calculation and a visual feedback system for volitional work-rate control. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the enhanced dynamic leg press for cardiopulmonary exercise training in constant-load training and high-intensity interval training. Five healthy participants aged 31.0±3.9 years (mean ± standard deviation) performed two cardiopulmonary training sessions: constant-load training and high-intensity interval training. Participants carried out the training sessions at a work rate that corresponds to their first ventilatory threshold for constant-load training, and their second ventilatory threshold for high-intensity interval training. RESULTS: All participants tolerated both training protocols, and could complete the training sessions with no complications. Substantial cardiopulmonary responses were observed. The difference between mean oxygen uptake and target oxygen uptake was 0.07±0.34 L/min (103 ±17%) during constant-load training, and 0.35±0.66 L/min (113 ±27%) during high-intensity interval training. The difference between mean heart rate and target heart rate was -7±19 bpm (94 ±15%) during constant-load training, and 4.2±16 bpm (103 ±12%) during high-intensity interval training. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced dynamic leg press was found to be feasible for cardiopulmonary exercise training, and for exercise prescription for different training programmes based on the ventilatory thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chrif et al. (2019) studied Healthy (n=5). Re-engineered dynamic leg press was evaluated on Difference between mean oxygen uptake and target oxygen uptake during constant-load training. The enhanced dynamic leg press was feasible for cardiopulmonary exercise training, with participants achieving a mean oxygen uptake within 0.07 L/min of the target during constant-load training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: