Why the study?
Studies suggesting myocardial protection with volatile anesthetic agents are scattered and often limited to a particular aspect of cardiac anesthesia.
Do newer volatile anesthetic agents provide better cardioprotection compared to older agents or TIVA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Do newer volatile anesthetic agents provide better cardioprotection compared to older agents or TIVA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Newer volatile anesthetics such as sevoflurane and desflurane appear to offer superior cardioprotective effects compared to older agents in cardiac anesthesia.
May inform volatile selection in cardiac surgery; leaves open superiority over TIVA in randomized trials.
Myocardial protection with volatile anesthetic agents have been suggested by multiple studies. These studies, however, are scattered and are often limited to a particular aspect of cardiac anesthesia. Older inhalational agents like halothane is known to cause significant hepatic damage in patients undergoing long duration surgeries while isoflurane is known to have marked vasodilating properties that also affects the coronary arteries leading to coronary “steal” phenomenon. Additionally, newer agents, like sevoflurane and desflurane, have shown more prominent cardioprotective effects than older agents. We searched ScholarOne, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library. The medical subject headings (MeSH) terms “anaesthesia, inhalational,” “anaesthesia, intravenous, or TIVA,” and “Cardiac anaesthesia or Cardiac Surgery” were used. Additional studies were identified by review of the reference sections of all eligible studies. The aim of this review article is to bring together the evidences with newer inhalational agents and provide a holistic view of their benefits and shortcomings in cardiac anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mandke et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: