Why the study?
Although hospitalist-orthopedic surgeon co-management has been reported to improve peri-operative care, its effectiveness and impact on healthcare resources remained uncertain.
Does selective hospitalist-orthopedic surgeon co-management based on the Charlson comorbidity index improve peri-operative care in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty?
Does selective hospitalist-orthopedic surgeon co-management based on the Charlson comorbidity index improve peri-operative care in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty?
Selective hospitalist-orthopedic surgeon co-management based on a Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 effectively identifies high-risk patients and allows for timely medical intervention without prolonging hospital stay.
Selective HOC in high-CCI THA patients may reduce complications; leaves open effects on resources and broader outcomes.
Purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for hip diseases, but peri-operative management of patients with multiple comorbidities is challenging due to an increased risk of medical complications. Hospitalist–orthopedic surgeon co-management (HOC) has been reported to improve peri-operative care, but its effectiveness and impact on healthcare resources remain uncertain. This prospective, single-center study evaluated the utility of selective HOC based on the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in THA peri-operative management. Methods This study included 90 consecutive cases with primary THA by a single orthopedic surgeon. Based on CCI, patients were divided into an HOC group (CCI score ≥2) and non-HOC group (CCI score <2). The HOC group received peri-operative care from a hospitalist and orthopedic surgeon, while non-HOC group was managed by an orthopedic surgeon alone. Medical and surgery-related complications, hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and costs were evaluated. Results There were 17 cases (19%) in the HOC group and 73 (81%) in non-HOC group. The mean CCI score was 3.1 ± 1.3 in the HOC group and 0.4 ± 0.5 in the non-HOC group. Medical complications were more frequent in the HOC group (35% vs. 4%), while surgery-related complications were comparable. No statistically significant difference was observed in length of stay, 30-day mortality, and costs. Conclusions Selective indication for HOC based on CCI effectively identified high-risk patients, enabling timely intervention for medical complications without prolonging hospital stay. This strategy may mitigate peri-operative medical risks while optimizing resource use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonoda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: