Why the study?
To compare the analgesic efficiency of intravenous fentanyl versus ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block to assist with positioning during spinal anaesthesia for femur fracture procedures.
Does ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block reduce pain during positioning compared to intravenous fentanyl in patients undergoing femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia?
Does ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block reduce pain during positioning compared to intravenous fentanyl in patients undergoing femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia?
Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block provides superior analgesia and positioning quality compared to intravenous fentanyl for patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for femur fractures.
Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block improves positioning comfort in femur fracture surgery; extends RCT evidence favoring regional over systemic analgesia for spinal anesthesia.
Objective: To assist in the administration of spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing femur fracture procedures, we conducted comparison research to compare the analgesic efficiency of intravenous fentanyl against ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB). Material and Methods: A group of 112 patients ranging in age from 18 to 70 years old who had ASA Physical Status I and II and were having femur fracture procedures under spinal anaesthesia participated in the randomised, prospective, interventional trial. These individuals were divided into two groups through a random assignment process. Group FENT (n = 56) received Intravenous fentanyl 1 microgram/kilogram (µg/kg) and five minutes before positioning for spinal anaesthetic, group FNB (n = 56) received ultrasound-guided FNB with 20 millilitres (ml), 1.5% lignocaine and adrenaline (1:200,000). Results: Comparison of pain scores during positioning using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) revealed that Group FENT had a score of 1.95 ± 0.585, whereas Group FNB had a score of 0.61 ± 0.562 (p-value 0.001). The FNB group demonstrated superior patient positioning quality. Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups, and no significant side effects were observed. Conclusion: FNB offers enhanced analgesia, improved patient positioning, higher patient satisfaction, reduced reliance on additional analgesia, and fewer side effects compared to intravenous fentanyl for spinal anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajbala et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: