Why the study?
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately quantify aortic regurgitation compared to supravalvular aortography in patients with aortic valve disease?
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately quantify aortic regurgitation compared to supravalvular aortography in patients with aortic valve disease?
Doppler echocardiography provides a reliable non-invasive method for quantifying pure aortic regurgitation, though its accuracy is reduced in the presence of concomitant aortic stenosis.
Doppler may support noninvasive AR quantification in pure cases; leaves open validation of precision with concomitant stenosis.
This study was undertaken to assess the contribution of Doppler echocardiography to the quantification of aortic valve regurgitation. Ultrasound examination was performed by recording aortic arch blood flow from the suprasternal notch. A non-invasive index of valve regurgitation was obtained by calculating the ratio between the maximal amplitude of forward flow during systole and the amplitude of retrograde flow during diastole measured at the onset of the R wave of the electrocardiogram. This index was compared with semiquantitative data derived from supravalvular aortography in 93 patients. In pure aortic regurgitation (67 patients) the results showed a high correlation coefficient between Doppler and angiographic estimates. In cases of associated aortic valve stenosis there were problems in the accurate estimation of systolic blood flow which led to global overestimation in general of the degree of regurgitation and considerable lack of precision in individual patients. But in general Doppler echocardiography appeared to be a successful technique to quantify pure aortic regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diébold et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: