September 18, 1993BMJOpen Access

Clinical features, risk factors, and referral delay in British patients of Indian and European origin with angina matched for age and extent of coronary atheroma.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Does medical abortion using mifepristone and gemeprost improve acceptability compared to surgical vacuum aspiration in women seeking induced abortion?

Structured PICO

Does medical abortion using mifepristone and gemeprost improve acceptability compared to surgical vacuum aspiration in women seeking induced abortion?

Population

Women seeking induced abortion in Britain

Intervention

Medical abortion using mifepristone and gemeprost

Comparator

Surgical vacuum aspiration

Outcome

Patient preference and acceptabilitypatient reported

Medical abortion is a safe and effective alternative to vacuum aspiration, and offering patients a choice maximizes acceptability.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Most women accept either method; leaves open whether medical abortion improves acceptability over vacuum aspiration.

Cite This Study

Shaukat et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a88efef6fb350aba912645b https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6906.717

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Clinical features, risk factors, and referral delay in British patients of Indian and European origin with angina matched for age and extent of coronary atheroma.

Structured PICO

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Clinical features, risk factors, and referral delay in British patients of Indian and European origin with angina matched for age and extent of coronary atheroma.

Structured PICO

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider