Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pacific chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) muscle was subjected to hydrothermal treatment (60–100C) for different time intervals (0–40 min). The texture of raw and heat treated muscles were determined using texture profile analysis. Hardness, cohesiveness, springiness (or elasticity), and chewiness of heat treated fish muscle were higher than those for raw muscle. Increase in time or temperature of treatment increased these textural attributes. However, softening of muscle, as indicated by the decrease in hardness, springiness and chewiness values, occurred with prolonged heating at higher temperatures (90–100C). Muscle cohesiveness was fairly unaffected by processing temperatures. In‐vitro digestibility of chum salmon muscle protein remained unaltered by thermal processing for the time‐temperature combinations studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattacharya et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: