In this paper, we compare a shift register (SR) to a delay-locked loop (DLL) for flexible multiphase clock generation, and motivate why a SR is not only more flexible but often also better. For a given power budget, we show that a SR almost always generates less jitter than a DLL, assuming both are realized with current-mode logic. This is due to differences in jitter accumulation and the possibility to choose latch delays in a SR much smaller than the delays of DLL elements. For -phase clock generation, a SR also functions as a divide-by- and requires a voltage-controlled oscillator with times higher frequency. However, this does not necessary lead to more power consumption and can even have advantages like higher Q and less area for the inductors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: