Why the study?
The registry aimed to characterize the procedural safety and device performance of the Portico THV at 30 days.
Does the Portico transcatheter heart valve demonstrate procedural safety and adequate device performance at 30 days in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
Does the Portico transcatheter heart valve demonstrate procedural safety and adequate device performance at 30 days in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
The Portico transcatheter heart valve demonstrated high procedural success, favorable hemodynamics, and low rates of mortality and stroke at 30 days, though new pacemaker implantation occurred in 19% of patients.
Registry data on Portico THV safety in high-risk AS; leaves open need for randomized comparisons.
A total of 1001 subjects (82.0 years, 62.5% female, 63.7% NYHA III/IV at baseline) with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk were enrolled in the prospective CONFIDENCE registry and treated with a Portico™ transcatheter heart valve (THV) using either a first-generation delivery system (DS) or the FlexNav™ DS. The objective of this registry is to characterize the procedural safety and device performance of the Portico™ THV at 30 days. The study collected ‘standard-of-care’ clinical and device performance data, with adverse events adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. The implantation of a single Portico™ THV was successful in 97.5% of subjects. The 30-day all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and disabling stroke rates were 2.6%, 2.1%, and 1.8%, respectively. A new pacemaker was implanted in 19.0% of subjects at 30 days. At 30 days, the effective orifice area and mean gradient values were 1.82 cm2 and 7.1 mmHg, respectively. The 30-day rate of moderate paravalvular leak (PVL) was 2.1%, with no occurrence of severe PVL. The Portico™ THV demonstrated improved hemodynamic performance and low rates of safety events at 30 days in a large cohort of subjects implanted with the Portico™ THV with either the first-generation DS or FlexNav™ DS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Möllmann et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: