Why the study?
What is the incidence and clinical impact of new-onset LBBB following TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
What is the incidence and clinical impact of new-onset LBBB following TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
New-onset LBBB is a frequent complication post-TAVI (29.5%) in this Gulf region cohort and is associated with subsequent conduction abnormalities requiring pacing.
New-onset LBBB post-TAVI warrants vigilant conduction monitoring; leaves open whether it predicts permanent pacing needs in prospective cohorts.
Background: Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients have not been reported in the Gulf region. Objectives: To define the baseline electrocardiographic (ECG), echocardiographic, and computed tomographic findings of patients undergoing TAVI and analyze the predictors of developing new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (LBBB). Methods: Patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI between 2013 and 2021 at the Sabah Al-Ahmed Cardiac Centre in Al-Amiri Hospital in the state of Kuwait were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, and preprocedural computed tomography data were extracted. The primary outcome was new-onset LBBB. Results: A total of 61 patients were included (65.6% females; mean age: 73.5 ± 9 years; baseline ejection fraction: 55.5% ± 9.7%). Of these, 18 developed new-onset LBBB. Those who developed LBBB tended to have lower ejection fraction (52.5 ± 9.6 vs. 56.8% ± 9.5%; P = 0.116). Those who developed LBBB were more likely to develop 1 st degree atrioventricular block post-TAVI ( P = 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI was 29.5%. The new-onset LBBB group was more likely to develop conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alabdulrazzaq et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: