Key result
Persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI is linked to reduced LVEF and ~38% shorter median survival.
Why the study?
Cardiac conduction abnormalities frequently occur after TAVI, and while pacemaker need is recognized, prevalent new-onset LBBB may also impact clinical outcomes.
Does persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI worsen LVEF and increase mortality in patients undergoing TAVI?
Does persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI worsen LVEF and increase mortality in patients undergoing TAVI?
Persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI is associated with worsened left ventricular function and decreased long-term survival, highlighting the need for close monitoring and potential resynchronization therapy.
Introduction Cardiac conduction abnormalities frequently occur after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). While the need for a permanent pacemaker (PM) is a recognized concern, new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) is also prevalent and may impact clinical outcomes. Aims To assess the incidence and persistence of new-onset LBBB after TAVI, its impact on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and its effect on survival. Methods Single-center retrospective cohort analysis of TAVI patients from January 2010 to January 2022. Primary outcomes included LBBB development, LBBB persistence, 1-year LVEF variation, and all-cause mortality. Results Of 552 patients, 431 were included after excluding those with prior PM (n=52), LBBB (n=30), or right bundle branch block (RBBB) (n=39). During hospitalization, 165 patients (38.3%) developed LBBB, 43 (10.1%) required PM implantation, and 7 (1.6%) developed RBBB. At 1-month follow-up, LBBB persisted in 69 cases (41.8%), with 2 additional patients developing persistent LBBB. Among the remaining new-onset LBBB cases, 38 (23%) underwent PM implantation, while LBBB resolved in 58 (35.8%). Patients with persistent LBBB exhibited a 6.2% lower LVEF variation at 1-year follow-up (95% CI: -8.1%, -4.5%, p<0.001) compared to those without rhythm disturbances. New-onset left ventricular dysfunction was significantly higher in persistent LBBB patients (16.9%) compared to only 0.01% in those without rhythm disturbances (p<0.001). In contrast, patients with transient LBBB showed no significant impact on LVEF evolution (p=0.295). Patients with persistent LBBB had a median survival of 58 months (±5.4), significantly lower than the 94 months (±10.4) observed in those without rhythm disturbances (p<0.001). When combining transient and persistent LBBB cases, no significant mortality differences were identified (p=0.431). Demographic parameters and comorbid conditions were well balanced between groups, with a median age of 81 years [IQR: 75-85], and 56% female. Conclusion Our study highlights the high prevalence and clinical impact of new-onset LBBB after TAVI. Nearly half of new-onset LBBB cases persisted, correlating with worsened LVEF and increased mortality. Recognizing LBBB risk pre-TAVI is crucial for informed treatment decisions, while closer post-TAVI monitoring is key for identifying those who may benefit from resynchronization therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lobo et al. (2025) studied this question. Persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI occurred in 41.8%, causing a 6.2% LVEF reduction and decreasing median survival from 94 to 58 months (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: