In a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion, hyperglycemia increases the dose requirement for levosimendan-induced, but not milrinone-induced, cardioprotection via mPTP inhibition.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support clinical preference for milrinone in hyperglycemic ischemia; leaves open dose optimization of levosimendan for human translation.
BACKGROUND: The authors examined whether milrinone and levosimendan could exert cardiac postconditioning effects in rats under normoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and whether the effects could be mediated by mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP). METHODS: Wistar rats underwent 30-min coronary artery occlusion followed by 2-h reperfusion. The rats received milrinone or levosimendan just before reperfusion under normoglycemic or hyperglycemic conditions with or without atractyloside, an mPTP opener. RESULTS: Under normoglycemia, both 30 μg/kg milrinone (29 ± 12%) and 10 μg/kg levosimendan (33 ± 13%) reduced infarct size compared with that in the control (58 ± 7%). Under hyperglycemia, milrinone (34 ± 13%) reduced infarct size at the same dose as under normoglycemia. In contrast, neither 10 nor 30 μg/kg levosimendan protected hyperglycemic hearts, and only 100 μg/kg levosimendan (32 ± 9%) reduced infarct size compared with that in the hyperglycemic control (58 ± 13%). All of these cardioprotective effects under normoglycemia and hyperglycemia are abolished by atractyloside. CONCLUSION: Milrinone and levosimendan exert postconditioning effects via inhibition of mPTP opening. Hyperglycemia raises the threshold of levosimendan-induced postconditioning, while milrinone-induced postconditioning is not influenced by hyperglycemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: