Why the study?
New Zealand White Rabbits are a useful preclinical model for neurovascular research and device testing, motivating the use of archived angiograms to obtain vascular measurements of interest for future research.
This study provides reference measurements for artery diameters and anatomic variations in New Zealand White Rabbits to facilitate future neurovascular disease modeling and device testing.
Supplies archived rabbit carotid aneurysm measurements for device testing; leaves open prospective validation in neurovascular models.
Background and purposeNew Zealand White Rabbits are a useful preclinical model for neurovascular research. Inducing right common carotid artery aneurysms in New Zealand White Rabbits gives researchers the ability to test neurovascular devices in vivo. This study takes advantage of archived angiograms to obtain vascular measurements of interest for future research in rabbit models.MethodsRabbit angiograms from endovascular studies conducted in-house between 2005 and 2024 were analyzed using ImageJ at points of interest along the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Using scale references, the diameters of various New Zealand White Rabbit (2.5-3.5 kg) arteries were measured for aneurysm models and controls. Anatomic vascular variations were categorized and recorded.ResultsMeasurable artery diameters at 39 points of interest were recorded for 170 female New Zealand White Rabbits. Type 1 vascular anatomy was the most common rabbit aortic arch, characterizing 85% of identifiable rabbit anatomies in this study.ConclusionBy making these measurements available, this study simplifies future neurovascular studies, allowing for vasculature to be selected by size depending on the application. Additionally, the study offers insight into the relationship between elastase-induced aneurysms and surrounding vasculature size and draws size comparisons between some key arteries of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: