Why the study?
Mindfulness training may promote medication adherence in outpatients with heart failure, but its feasibility and acceptability needed to be determined.
Does phone-delivered mindfulness training improve medication adherence and other outcomes in outpatients with chronic heart failure?
Does phone-delivered mindfulness training improve medication adherence and other outcomes in outpatients with chronic heart failure?
Phone-delivered mindfulness training is feasible and acceptable in heart failure outpatients, potentially improving functional capacity and cognitive function, though it did not improve medication adherence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasible and acceptable in HF outpatients; leaves open efficacy on adherence and outcomes pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Mindfulness training (MT) may promote medication adherence in outpatients with heart failure. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility and acceptability of MT (primary outcomes) and explore effects on medication adherence, functional capacity, cognitive function, depression, and mindfulness skills (secondary outcomes). METHODS: In this pre/post-design study, participants received a 30-minute phone-delivered MT session weekly for 8 weeks. RESULTS: We enrolled 33 outpatients (32% women; 69.7 White; mean age, 60.3 years). Retention was 100%, and session attendance was 91%. Overall, participants (97%) rated MT as enjoyable. Objectively assessed ( P < .05) adherence decreased post intervention, whereas improvements were noted in functional capacity ( P = .05), mindfulness ( P < .05), and cognitive function (reaching significance for Flanker scores). CONCLUSIONS: Phone-delivered MT was feasible and acceptable. Whereas no improvements were noted in medication adherence and depression, cognitive function, functional capacity, and mindfulness levels increased post intervention, suggesting MT may have beneficial effects in outpatients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salmoirago‐Blotcher et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: