Why the study?
Does angiotensin (1-7) improve cardiac function and structural markers in rats with diabetic cardiomyopathy?
Does angiotensin (1-7) improve cardiac function and structural markers in rats with diabetic cardiomyopathy?
Angiotensin (1-7) attenuates diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats by improving hemodynamics, reducing fibrosis, and improving dyslipidemia.
Supports angiotensin (1-7) testing in diabetic cardiomyopathy models; leaves open translation to human therapy.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the effect of angiotensin (1-7), a Mas receptor agonist, and A-779, a Mas receptor antagonist, in rats with diabetic cardiomyopathy (DC). METHODS: Rats treated with a single injection of streptozotocin (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), developed DC after 8 weeks. The extent of DC was assessed by measuring the left ventricular weight/body weight (LVW/BW) ratio, absolute LVW, left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), maximum change in left ventricular pressure over time (dp/dtmax), minimum change in left ventricular pressure over time (dp/dtmin), left ventricular (LV) protein content, LV collagen content, lipid profile, and serum nitrite/nitrate concentration. Test drug treatment was given from week 4 to week 8. RESULTS: Angiotensin (1-7) treatment attenuated DC by significantly increasing LVDP, dp/dtmax, dp/dtmin, serum nitrite/nitrate concentration and significantly decreasing the LVW/BW ratio and LV collagen content. For the first time, this study has documented that endogenous angiotensin (1-7) regulates lipid profile in rats, and that treatment with angiotensin (1-7) significantly attenuates diabetes-induced changes in lipid profile. However, LV protein content and absolute LVW remain unaffected after treatment. CONCLUSION: Angiotensin (1-7) significantly attenuates DC in rats because of vasodilatory, antiproliferative and anifibrotic properties but also because of a significant decrease in dyslipidemia, the major culprit for cardiac dysfunctions in diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: