Japanese quail were divergently selected for 4-wk body weight under two different nutritional environments. In one environment quail were divergently selected for high and low body weight (H and L) under a split diet (SD) with quail having the opportunity to self-select feed from high protein and high energy diets. In the other environment, quail were similarly selected (H and L) under a normal (28% protein) complete diet (CD). After 11 generations of selection, H-SD and H-CD lines were 48.9 and 49.7% higher in 4-wk body weight than controls. Quail from L-SD and L-CD lines were 46.5 and 45.4% lower in 4-wk body weight than controls. Realized heritabilities for 4-wk body weight were .36 +/- .03, .30 +/- .03, .52 +/- .02, and .47 +/- .03 for H-SD, L-SD, H-CD, and L-CD lines, respectively. Selection differentials were significantly higher in the SD than in the CD environment. Changes in 2-wk, adult body, and egg weight across generations paralleled that of the trait under selection (4-wk body weight). Selection also resulted in decreased hatchability and egg production with increased age to sexual maturity in both environments. The SD environment was determined to be a stress environment because of birds' inferior growth there compared with growth in the CD environment. Rate of growth, however, to reach adult body size was superior for L-SD quail once the stress environment was removed. There was also evidence that eggs were larger for quail in the SD than the CD environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DARDEN et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: