Why the study?
Does heart rate variability accurately determine the anaerobic threshold during progressive resistance exercise in men with coronary artery disease?
Does heart rate variability accurately determine the anaerobic threshold during progressive resistance exercise in men with coronary artery disease?
Heart rate variability is a feasible, noninvasive method for determining the anaerobic threshold during progressive resistance exercise in patients with coronary artery disease, aiding in cardiac rehabilitation planning.
HRV thresholds may align with lactate for anaerobic threshold in CAD; hypothesis-generating, prospective validation required before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the magnitude of the metabolic and autonomic responses during progressive resistance exercise (PRE) is associated with the determination of the anaerobic threshold (AT). AT is an important parameter to determine intensity in dynamic exercise. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the metabolic and cardiac autonomic responses during dynamic resistance exercise in patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). METHOD: Twenty men (age = 63±7 years) with CAD [Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) = 60±10%] underwent a PRE protocol on a leg press until maximal exertion. The protocol began at 10% of One Repetition Maximum Test (1-RM), with subsequent increases of 10% until maximal exhaustion. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) indices from Poincaré plots (SD1, SD2, SD1/SD2) and time domain (rMSSD and RMSM), and blood lactate were determined at rest and during PRE. RESULTS: Significant alterations in HRV and blood lactate were observed starting at 30% of 1-RM (p<0.05). Bland-Altman plots revealed a consistent agreement between blood lactate threshold (LT) and rMSSD threshold (rMSSDT) and between LT and SD1 threshold (SD1T). Relative values of 1-RM in all LT, rMSSDT and SD1T did not differ (29%±5 vs 28%±5 vs 29%±5 Kg, respectively). CONCLUSION: HRV during PRE could be a feasible noninvasive method of determining AT in CAD patients to plan intensities during cardiac rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sperling et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: