This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A request to admit a hospital inpatient with motor neurone disease to the hospice generated unusual unease. Significantly, withdrawal of ventilation had already been planned. The presumption that ventilation would be withdrawn after transfer presented a dilemma. Should the hospice accept the admission? If so, should the hospice staff stop the ventilation, and then when and how? Debate centred on the continuity of best interests and the logistics of withdrawing ventilation. The factors making the request contentious identified competing interests within hospice admission decision making that could detrimentally impact on patient care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Gannon (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: