Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbohydrate malabsorption and subsequent gastrointestinal symptoms are a common clinical problem in pediatrics. Hydrogen (H2) and methane (CH4) breath tests are a cheap and non-invasive procedure for diagnosing fructose and lactose malabsorption (FM/LM) but test accuracy and reliability as well as the impact of non-hydrogen producers (NHP) is unclear. CH4 breath tests (MBT), blood sugar tests (BST) and clinical symptoms were compared with H2 breath tests (HBT) for FM/LM. 187/82 tests were performed in children (2 to 18 years) with unclear chronic/recurrent abdominal pain and suspected FM/LM. In FM and LM, we found a significant correlation between HBT and MBT/BST. In LM, MBT differentiated most of the patients correctly and BST might be used as an exclusion test. However, additional MBT and BST had no diagnostic advantage in FM. NHP still remain a group of patients, which cannot be identified using the recommended CH4 cut-off values in FM or LM. Reported symptoms during breath tests are not a reliable method to diagnose FM/LM. Overall a combined test approach might help in diagnosing children with suspected carbohydrate malabsorption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: