Medical personnel accidentally exposed to blood from patients who had acute hepatitis or carried hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were assigned randomly to receive two injections one month apart of immune serum globulin containing a high titer of antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) (269 subjects), an intermediate titer (223 subjects), or a normal titer (265 subjects). Four months after exposure nearly 7% of recipients of normal-titer globulin or intermediate-titer globulin had developed hepatitis B, whereas no cases had appeared among recipients of high-titer globulin (P < 0.01). However, an excess of late-onset cases in recipients of high-titer globulin nullified initial evidence of protection; at follow-up at nine months, the cumulative incidence of hepatitis B had reached 8.7%, 7.3%, and 7.2%, respectively, in the three groups (P > 0.30). Intercurrent infection was estimated to have accounted for only 20% of late-onset cases; 80% were thought to reflect an effect of high-titer globulin which was sufficient to delay onset but insufficient to reduce clinical severity. Many of these cases emerged in the presence of anti-HBs residual from administration of hightiter globulin, whereas no cases occurred in individuals who already possessed minimal amounts of anti-HBs at the time of exposure. The high-titer globulin was found to contain fragmented anti-HBs which may have interfered with the neutralizing activity of the large amount of unfragmented anti-HBs also present in the high-titer globulin. In any event, the lack of significant protection in the current trial means that a decision to use high-titer globulin as postexposure prophylaxis will have to rest upon the evidence of protection that has been obtained by others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: