Why the study?
Does helper virus-free HSV-1 amplicon delivery reduce innate immune response in the CNS compared to helper virus-packaged amplicons in mice?
Does helper virus-free HSV-1 amplicon delivery reduce innate immune response in the CNS compared to helper virus-packaged amplicons in mice?
Helper virus-free HSV-1 amplicon preparations exhibit a safer innate immune response profile in the CNS compared to conventional helper virus-packaged amplicons, supporting their potential for CNS gene transfer strategies.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The development and implementation of direct gene transfer technologies for the study and treatment of chronic CNS disorders inherently requires consideration of vector safety. Virus-based vectors represent the most efficient modalities but harbor the potential to induce vigorous innate and adaptive immune responses when administered in vivo. These responses can arise because of virus particle components, resultant viral gene expression, and/or transgene expression. In the current study, we describe the innate responses elicited upon stereotactic delivery of herpes simplex virus type 1-based amplicon vectors. C57BL/6 mice were injected with sterile saline, beta-galactosidase-expressing amplicon (HSVlac) packaged by a conventional helper virus-based technique, or helper virus-free HSVlac. After killing the mice at either 1 or 5 days after transduction, we analyzed them by immunocytochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR for various chemokine, cytokine, and adhesion molecule gene transcripts. All injections induced inflammation, with blood/brain barrier opening on day 1 that was enhanced with both amplicon preparations as compared with saline controls. By day 5, mRNA levels for the pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma), chemokines (MCP-1, IP-10), and an adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) had returned to baseline in saline-injected mice and to near-baseline levels in helper virus-free amplicon groups. In contrast, mice injected with helper virus-packaged amplicon stocks elicited elevated inflammatory molecule expression and immune cell infiltration even at day 5. In aggregate, we demonstrate that helper virus-free amplicon preparations exhibit a safer innate immune response profile, presumably as a result of the absence of helper virus gene expression, and provide support for future amplicon-based CNS gene transfer strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Helper virus-free HSV-1 amplicons attenuate murine CNS inflammation; leaves open translation to human gene therapy applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olschowka et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: