Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper revisits the conception of heterodox economics advanced by Tony Lawson in 2006 and critically assesses its reception. I consider the bearing of later contributions—most importantly, his 2013 paper ‘What is this “school” called neoclassical economics’—in which Lawson further develops his analysis of heterodox economics. The goal is to provide additional clarity to the discussion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yannick Slade‐Caffarel (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: