Why the study?
Does paced respiration at different frequencies alter heart period and heart period variability compared to unpaced breathing in adults?
Does paced respiration at different frequencies alter heart period and heart period variability compared to unpaced breathing in adults?
The finding that paced respiration reduces heart period without altering HPV frequency components questions the validity of these components as measures of autonomic control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Paced breathing may confound heart period measures; challenges HPV frequency components as autonomic indices and leaves open clinical use.
The present study investigated psychophysiological responses to paced respiration of different frequencies. Twenty men and 20 women (mean age: 24.3 years) underwent five breathing conditions (paced with 0.15 Hz, 0.20 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.30 Hz, and unpaced), each lasting 5 min. As dependent physiological measures heart period, and different heart period variability (HPV) parameters were assessed. Psychological variables consisted of mood estimates as well as rated accuracy and effort to follow the pacing rhythm. HPV decreased with higher breathing frequencies, under paced and unpaced conditions, whereas mood ratings did not change. Subjects indicated more effort and less accuracy in following the pacing signal, the more its frequency differed from their spontaneous breathing frequency. The comparison of a spontaneous breathing condition with a frequency-matched paced condition revealed that pacing per se provoked a reduction in heart period. Because this decrease was not accompanied by changes in any of the HPV frequency components, their validity as measures of autonomic control needs to be questioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stark et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: