Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The oxidation of the half-reduced cyanide complex of cytochrome oxidase (a2+·Cu1+·a33+CN) by ferricyanide showed a one to one correlation between the formation of the 830-nm absorption band and the generation of the EPR Cu(II) signal at g = 2. Both required 1.0 mole of ferricyanide per mole of cytochrome oxidase of 4 oxidation equivalents. On the other hand, the titration measured at 603 nm required 2.4 moles of oxidant; the fractional ratio apparently resulted from absorbance contribution by the Cu(II) chromophore. The titration curves measured at 830 nm and by EPR for the fully reduced cyanide complex (a2+·Cu1+·a32+CN) were sigmoidal. These and other observations suggest that significant heme-copper interaction exists between the EPR-sensitive copper chromophore and cytochrome a on one hand and cytochrome a3 on the other. Structurally and functionally the EPR-sensitive copper which shows the 830-nm absorption band is most likely to be sandwiched between cytochromes a and a3, whereas the EPR-insensitive copper, which does not contribute to the 830-nm band, may serve only as an electron sink. Some of the divergent results reported in the literature may be reconciled on the basis of these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yong et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: