Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Calculations of the g tensor of three copper(II) complexes [Cu(NH3)4]2+, [CuCl4]2-, and plastocyanin are presented. Two different sum-over-states-based approaches are considered, making use of the multistate CASPT2 method for excitation energies and PMCAS (perturbation modified CAS) wave functions for the computation of the angular momentum and spin-orbit coupling matrix elements. Test calculations on [Cu(NH3)4]2+ and [CuCl4]2- point to the need of including in the MS-CASPT2 treatment the specific charge-transfer state with an electron excited out of the bonding counterpart of the ground-state SOMO. The computed g shifts for these two molecules present a considerable improvement with respect to the results obtained from our previous g tensor calculations based instead on CASSCF/CASPT2. This is shown to be related to an improved description of the covalency of the Cu-L bonds. For the calculations on plastocyanin, different models are used, taken from a recent (QM/MM) DFT study by Sinnecker and Neese. The effect of the surrounding protein is taken into account by surrounding the central cluster either with a dielectric continuum (epsilon = 4) or with a set of point charges. The second approach is found to be indispensable for an accurate description of environmental effects. With this approach, the calculated g values compare to within 30 ppt with the experimental data of plastocyanin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vancoillie et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: