Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is the leading cause of preventable hospital death, but prophylaxis remains underused despite established guidelines, with worldwide adequacy rates near 50%.
What is the adequacy of venous thromboembolism risk stratification and prophylactic measures prescribed by attending physicians compared to guideline recommendations in hospitalized adult patients?
What is the adequacy of venous thromboembolism risk stratification and prophylactic measures prescribed by attending physicians compared to guideline recommendations in hospitalized adult patients?
While venous thromboembolism risk stratification adequacy remains low (50.8%), the overall prophylaxis prescription adequacy rate (71.5%) in this tertiary hospital is higher than global averages.
Local VTE prophylaxis adequacy exceeds global benchmarks; supports quality audits but leaves practice change to prospective trials.
Background Venous thromboembolism is the third most common cardiovascular disease and the main cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. Prophylaxis is still underused, despite well-established guidelines in the literature. Studies show a worldwide prophylaxis adequacy rate close to 50%. Objectives To assess the adequacy of risk stratification and prophylactic measures for venous thromboembolism in a tertiary university hospital. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was carried out, collecting data from medical records. Adult patients hospitalized by different specialties were enrolled and divided into surgical and clinical groups. The risk stratification of venous thromboembolism performed by the attending physicians was compared with stratification based on recent guidelines performed by the research physicians. Prophylaxis measures prescribed by the attending physicians were compared with guideline recommendations, thus obtaining the prophylaxis adequacy rate. Results 400 patients were analyzed, 169 (42.3%) surgical and 231 (57.7%) clinical. The overall stratification adequacy rate was 50.8%. Adequacy rates were 39.1% and 59.3% in the surgical and clinical groups respectively (P < 0.0001). The overall prophylaxis adequacy rate was 71.5%, with 78.1% in the surgical group and 66.7% in the clinical group (P=0.0137). Conclusions Risk stratification adequacy is low, demonstrating a low awareness among prescribing physicians of the need for adequate stratification for prescription of prophylaxis. However, the prophylaxis prescription adequacy rates are higher than those in global data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramalli et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: