Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) negative breast tumors often present with enhanced expression and/or activation of growth factor receptors, resulting in increased growth factor signaling and hyperactivation of MAPK (ERK1 and ERK2). We have pre-viously shown that ERalpha(+) MCF-7 cells with elevated growth factor signaling lose expression of ERalpha without any ligand-independent transcriptional activation, and this is a reversible effect attributable to ERK1/2 hyperactivation. Here, we show that down-regulation of ERalpha is not mediated by a specific ERK-1 vs. ERK-2 substrate. Despite up-regulated activator protein-1 activity in response to ERK1/2 activation, and in ERalpha(-) and hormone-independent breast cancers, we find that increased activator protein-1 activity is not responsible for ERalpha down-regulation. Interestingly, our findings implicate a cytoplasmic substrate of ERK1/2. However, RSK1, the best-characterized cytoplasmic ERK1/2 substrate, does not down-regulate ERalpha in our models. On the other hand, inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB (which is linked to chemoresistance in cancer in general and has elevated activity in hormone-independent and ERalpha- breast cancer) significantly enhances ERalpha activity, suggesting that indirect elevation in nuclear factor-kappaB activity (due to hyperactive ERK1/2) is at least partially responsible for ERalpha down-regulation in these cell line models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holloway et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: