Why the study?
Does lower-dose epidural ropivacaine provide effective anesthesia with fewer hemodynamic side effects compared to higher doses in men undergoing transurethral surgery?
Does lower-dose epidural ropivacaine provide effective anesthesia with fewer hemodynamic side effects compared to higher doses in men undergoing transurethral surgery?
Low-dose epidural ropivacaine provides effective anesthesia for transurethral surgery with fewer hemodynamic side effects than higher doses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports lower-dose epidural ropivacaine for transurethral surgery to limit side effects; extends dose-optimization evidence in men.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of 3 different doses of ropivacaine on the quality of anesthesia and hemodynamics in epidural anesthesia for transurethral surgery. METHODS: The current study was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty of Erciyes University, Turkey, between May 2004 and June 2006. The study recruited 81 males of ASA I- II group, ages 60-80 years, undergoing transurethral resection of prostate or bladder tumors. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups receiving epidural ropivacaine in different doses and concentrations. Group I (n=27) received 15 ml (102.5mg) of 0.75% solution, group II (n=27) received 10 ml (75 mg) of 0.75% solution, and group III (n=27) received 10 ml (50mg) 0.5% ropivacaine. The quality of the blocks and the hemodynamic changes were compared. RESULTS: Motor block was significantly less in group III than in groups I and II. The sensory block level was T6 or more in 55% of patients in group I, 35% in group II, and 21% in group III. The duration of sensory block was less, and the time to achieve the T10 level was greater in group III. Hypotension and bradycardia were more frequent in group I. CONCLUSION: Effective anesthesia with few side effects was obtained with low dose ropivacaine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Güler et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: