Why the study?
The study aimed to determine whether oral anticoagulants are potentially inappropriately prescribed or omitted in elderly patients with AF using STOPP/START criteria, and to evaluate their impact on mortality.
Does oral anticoagulant therapy improve 36-month mortality in elderly, frail patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does oral anticoagulant therapy improve 36-month mortality in elderly, frail patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In frail and comorbid elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulant therapy was not associated with improved 36-month survival, highlighting the complexity of applying standard guidelines to this population.
STOPP/START flags frequent OAT misprescribing in elderly AF; leaves open whether routine screening improves net outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is common in the elderly. A key component of AF management is Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (OAT), consisting of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) or Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim of the present study is to check, using STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions)/START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) Criteria, if such drugs are potentially inappropriately prescribed/omitted in an elderly population with AF, and to determine their impact on mortality. METHODS: This study included patients (n = 427) with nonvalvular AF consecutively evaluated between 2013 and 2019 at the Geriatric Outpatient Service, University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, and followed up for 36 months. The OAT group included 330 patients; the other 97 patients constituted the non-OAT group. The sample was assessed for STOPP/START criteria. RESULTS: We found no difference (p > 0.1) in comorbidity burden, frailty, and cardio-cerebro-vascular disease prevalence in the two groups, which also did not present a difference in 36-month mortality (p = 0.97). OAT was overall appropriately taken, and 62.4% of OAT-group presented the START criterion to take antiplatelets but also the STOPP criterion not to take them, because of the simultaneous anticoagulant intake. In the non-OAT group, 69.1% presented the START criterion to take anticoagulants, and 21.6% the START criterion to take antiplatelets. CONCLUSION: Patients with AF are often prone to under or over-prescription, particularly of antithrombotic drugs. The STOPP/START criteria are a valid tool to assess and correct wrong therapeutic choices. In frail and comorbid subjects, survival is not correlated with the assumption of OAT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salis et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: