Why the study?
Does G-CSF treatment reduce adverse remodelling in patients with large anterior STEMI and LV dysfunction after successful reperfusion?
Does G-CSF treatment reduce adverse remodelling in patients with large anterior STEMI and LV dysfunction after successful reperfusion?
G-CSF therapy may attenuate long-term left ventricular remodeling after large anterior STEMI, though it does not significantly improve clinical outcomes.
G-CSF attenuates remodeling without clinical benefit in anterior STEMI; extends prior trials but leaves outcome improvement unresolved.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment induces a sustained benefit on adverse remodelling in patients with large anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after successful reperfusion. METHODS: The STEM-AMI Trial was a prospective, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Sixty consecutive patients with a first anterior STEMI, who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention 2-12 h after symptom onset, with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% measured by echocardiography within 12 h after successful revascularisation (TIMI flow score ≥2), were randomised 1:1 to G-CSF (5 µg/Kg body weight b.i.d.) or placebo. Clinical events and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) were monitored, and LVEF, LV end-diastolic (LVEDV) and end-systolic (LVESV) volumes, and infarct size were evaluated by MRI at the final 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients completed the study, of whom 35 with MRI. No significant differences were found in mortality and MACCE between G-CSF and placebo-treated groups. The 3-year infarct size was not different between groups, whereas LVEDV was significantly lower in G-CSF (n=20) than in placebo (n=15) patients (170.1±8.1 vs 197.2±8.9 mL, respectively; p=0.033 at analysis of covariance). A significant inverse correlation was detected in G-CSF patients between the number of circulating CD34 cells at 30 days after reperfusion and the 3-year absolute and indexed LVEDV (ρ=-0.71, 95% CI -0.90 to -0.30, and ρ=-0.62, -0.86 to -0.14, respectively), or their change over time (r=-0.59, -0.85 to -0.11, and r=-0.55, -0.83 to -0.06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF therapy may be beneficial in attenuating ventricular remodelling subsequent to a large anterior STEMI in the long term. No differences have been detected in clinical outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Achilli et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: