The Penile Versus the Perineal Approach With the Small-Carrion Prosthesis

No AccessJournal of Urology1 Oct 1981The Penile Versus the Perineal Approach With the Small-Carrion Prosthesis James I. Harty, and Mohammad Amin James I. HartyJames I. Harty More articles by this author , and Mohammad AminMohammad Amin More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)54583-8AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail We reviewed our experience with insertion of the Small-Carrion prosthesis and compared the penile to the perineal approach. We found that the penile approach is more satisfactory since it resulted in fewer complications and a shorter operative time. © 1981 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 126Issue 4October 1981Page: 473-474 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1981 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information James I. Harty More articles by this author Mohammad Amin More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...