Why the study?
What are the long-term survival and pacemaker reoperation rates in pediatric patients with surgically induced complete heart block?
What are the long-term survival and pacemaker reoperation rates in pediatric patients with surgically induced complete heart block?
While pediatric patients with surgically induced complete heart block have good long-term survival, they face a high incidence of pacemaker-related reoperations over time.
High reoperation rates in pediatric surgical heart block warrant close monitoring; leaves open optimal device strategies.
Of 1,193 consecutive pediatric (less than 18 years) patients undergoing intracardiac repair from 1975 to 1984, 38 (3.2%) developed surgically induced complete heart block and were treated by permanent pacemaker implantation. Anomalies included complete atrioventricular septal defect = 9 (24%), simple ventricular septal defect = 9 (24%), atrioventricular discordant connection = 8 (212), tetralogy of Fallot = 7 (182), and other complex anomalies = 5 (13%). There were no hospital deaths. follow-up was 100% complete. There were six late deaths = 16%. Actuarial survival was 79 + 9% at 10 years. None of the late deaths were related to disturbance of cardiac rhythm or pacemaker system failure. Twelve patients (32%), required 27 reoperations for various types of pacemaker system failure. Indications for reoperation included: lead failure (44%). Pulse generator failure (44%), and wound sepsis (12%). Actuarial freedom from any pacemaker related reoperation was 50 + 16% at 48 months and 25 + 15% at 96 months. Only first reoperation was found to be an incremental risk factor for subsequent reoperation (p = 0.03). Surgical heart block has been neutralized as a risk factor for hospital death after repair of congenital cardiac defects. The risk of the development of surgical heart block now approaches zero, as indicated by a decreased incidence (1 of 401 = 0.25%) in our institution from 1985 to 1987, as compared to the era 1975 to 1984 (p = 0.001).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGrath et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: