This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Failure of long-term lamivudine prophylaxis in patients with resolved hepatitis B infection undergoing chemotherapy and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies: two case reportsHepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well known complication in patients with resolved HBV infection, i.e., HBsAg negative, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive ± antibodies against HBsAg (anti-HBs), undergoing chemotherapy (CT) and/or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for onco-hematological diseases.[1][2][3] In these patients, this risk can be prevented by either "pre-emptive anti-HBV therapy", based on the monitoring of HBV DNA and/or HBsAg, followed by rescue therapy with anti-HBV regimens, or by "anti-HBV prophylaxis" based on the administration of nucleos(t)ides analogs (NUCs) during immunosuppression and for a consolidation time after the end of immunosuppressive drugs.As per standard procedure in our centre, all patients with hematological malignancies and a resolved HBV infection receive lamivudine (LMV) prophylaxis at the time of CT or HSCT to be maintained for at least 18 months after the discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grossi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: